I have analyzed the new per cause system that was started in Aug by Development Direction. At first look, it seems to be definite success. Development Direction brings have typically been placed in a evaluation that is released to sub companies on the 1st and Fifteenth of each 30 days. Each evaluation usually contains more than 100+ tasks in each coverage area per evaluation.
I seemed carefully at cause purchase and excellent, and found some stunning information. In contrast to experts, bad cause rate was only 6%. What was most interesting about from the pipeline evaluation of brings, 40% of the brings would better serve the common and sub companies by instantly being sent, instead of patiently waiting on two posting schedules in each 30 days. This give a appropriate contacting period so the sub sandwiches can meet the bid schedules on the tasks, and the generals can depend on timeliness of their demands.
Two full months in, after releasing the per cause system in Aug, the results are looking ver appealing. So far, out of the initial 130 sub sandwiches, only 10 have stopped their account in the system. Termination reasons different too. Two, were companies that were trying to see if they could perform as sub sandwiches with construction pipeline leads; one sub was moving to a different state that isn't protected. The staying seven were disappointed with the system and stopped. This is only a 5% cancelation rate, which is an excellent rate.
The greatest project for a real Development Direction evaluation, is obviously customer care. The better excellent of brings for sub sandwiches is the main desire for Development Direction. So if Development Direction brings are able to provide precise and appropriate results in it members, and are also such as personal customer service repetitions allocated to handle and perform with individual companies; not only will construction pipeline be satisfied with the out-come, so will each company that gets brings from construction pipeline.
